Using Protractor With Phantomjs
Solution 1:
Is this still the case and Protractor still having issues with PhantomJS?
This is very true.
If so how bad is it and is there any better option?
It's difficult to answer how bad is it, but there are multiple issues about hanging phantomjs, dying phantomjs, performing slow phantomjs e.g.:
- PhantomJS sometimes crashes (open issue for more than a year)
According to the question, the main reason for you to use protractor
is end-to-end testing. You should try to imitate real-world use cases, imitate a real user working in your application. What browser would a real user use? PhantomJS? The answer is probably "no". Use the browsers which your application is designed to work in, and the browsers your real users use.
How would I do E2E testing when my app is being deployed to server?
The most "natural" approach is to use a remote selenium server that provides different capabilities - browsers and platforms. You can start up and configure your own selenium server, or you can use BrowserStack
or Sauce Labs
which are doing a great job providing you a way to test your application among a wide variety of different browsers and systems.
You can also run protractor in a headless "environment" with no real, but virtual display (xvfb
), see more here.
Solution 2:
You may use chrome itself in headless mode in 59 version onwards without any external tools.
capabilities: {
browserName: 'chrome',
chromeOptions:
{
args: [ "--headless", "--window size=800,600" ]
}
}
Post a Comment for "Using Protractor With Phantomjs"